Sunday, 19 August 2007

Islam in Charge at BBC

The BBC has excelled itself once again. A two-part 'Casualty' special showing a Muslim suicide bomber causing carnage has been changed ever so slightly. It's now going to be a bomb planted by English animal rights extremists. A BBC spokesperson stated that it was against BBC policy to broadcast anything that may upset Muslims and therefore put BBC staff in danger. Channel 4 however, has decided that freedom of speech is actually worth defending and will defy UK Islamonazis and broadcast 'Britz', a drama featuring a Muslim female suicide bomber in London.

Well it looks like the Muslim Killing Machine is stepping up a few gears in Iraq. Not satisfied with killing 300 men, women and children by blowing up fuel tankers outside local schools they decided to launch a mortar attack in Eastern Baghdad this morning. The insurgents responsible for today's attack were, however, said to be 'deeply dissappointed' at killing only 7 women and children in the name of 'Allah the merciful'. The group's leader has now been summoned by local imams to explain his pitiful results.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

This move by the BBC won't surprise anyone. Mollycoddling Islamists and glossing over uncomfortable truths regarding the Islamists' agenda and beliefs has become the BBC's stock-in-trade.

And just look at their recent gushing sycophantic reporting showing the Islamist terrorists Hamas in a very favourable light. As a Briton, I can't for the life of me understand why Israel doesn't just ban the BBC. Its anti-Israeli anti-American, and ultimately anti-Western agenda is there, plain for all to see.

The BBC: a national embarrassment.

Anonymous said...

The BBC employs a Hamas member (at least one). I've forgotten his name (it came to light when their precious pro-Palestinian, anti-Israeli correspondant/propaganda distributer, Alan Johnston, was--taken hostage by the very people he was bending over backwards to make seem civilised and not genocidal, oppressive miscreants), but what it basically means is that you, me and your aunt Flo fund a terrorist organisation through the licence fee.
Israel shouldn't just ban the BBC (which, it should of course), it should ban British industry and academic institutions--you know, like we do with them. And then when we're shuffling around wearing big beards, silly clothes, women are covered up unless they feel like getting a beating by the moral police, most of us are unemployed (because getting on your knees five times a day isn't ever conducive to enterprise, scientific or other) and our economies have collapsed and our scientific institutions have been replaced by grovelling to Allah; then we can pretend as though it's a result of the 'emergance of India and China as world powers and the resutling shift in economic and political influence' and not because we've systematically taken a shotgun and, figuratively, shot off both of our feet.
Persoanlly I wouldn't give a shit if the BBC is biased and about as credible as my mate Mick who likes to give his opinion on world affairs after 8 pints before puking in the car park and stumbling home sobbing. No, it's the fact that we have no choice but to pay for it, is what gets me. How that ever came about is one thing, but why it still exists today, in the era of internet TV, satellite TV, cable TV and so on, is mingboggling.

Anonymous said...

The BBC makes everybody sick with their anti-west agenda. The irony is that if the islamonazis ever did take power in the UK then the sandal polishing liberals at the BBC would be the first with their heads on the block (quite literally).
And, Infidelsalwayswin's gripe about having to pay a licence fee whether you watch the BBC or not is totally legit. After all, you wouldn't be expected to pay Tesco for the privilege of shopping at sainsburys.
It's about time the BBC stood on it's own 2 feet. let it show ads or even become a pay-per-view channel. When the UK turns totally digital in a couple of years time it should make the licence fee optional. if you don't want bbc channels then you don't pay the licence fee. maybe even do a 'light version' where you only pay for certain channels.

Anonymous said...

BBC sticks it in and breaks it off with the license fees and you get propaganda. Here is the states, we have the badges and guns of government taking money from us for PBS, CPB, APM, and NPR. The way it is done is hidden because it is extorted through taxes, not a slip of paper bought at the local branch of the post office.

The British COULD, en masse, refuse to pay the fees in the form of a national strike. (Why you haven't I don't know). Here, we've no path to do that.

--the friendly grizzly--